1. Skip to Menu
  2. Skip to Content
  3. Skip to Footer>

New Honduran Government Seeks to Prove Legitimacy

PDF Print E-mail

In Tegucigalpa, the morning of Monday, June 29 was calm. Shops and businesses were opening as usual, giving little sign of the political upheaval of the previous day.

In the early hours of June 28, members of the Honduran military stormed the Presidential House. President Jose Zelaya was evicted from the premises at gunpoint and flown out of the country. As the population began to wake up, many areas were without electricity. The supply was reportedly switched off to prevent Zelaya´s supporters from broadcasting propaganda. Nationwide bus services were canceled for June 28, in an attempt to stop radicals from taking advantage of the power vacuum.

President Zelaya´s ousting follows weeks of heated criticism from the population. On June 28 Hondurans were due to vote in a referendum on the addition of a ´fourth box´ to November´s election. The fourth box would allow constitutional change. Zelaya´s critics had feared that he would use the fourth box to attempt to hold on to power beyond the end of his term. Under the current constitution, only one Presidential term is permitted.

On June 22 the Honduran Supreme Court ruled that no referendum could be held 180 days before or after an election. Under this ruling, the proposed referendum on June 28 would have been against the law. In a speech on the evening of June 25, the former President showed his contempt for the legislature, telling supporters: “We will not obey the Supreme Court. . . [The court] only causes problems for democracy.”

Zelaya was elected in 2005 in a close race with National Party leader Pepe Lobo, promising to tackle Honduras´s street crime and high poverty rates. During his Presidency, he has sought to break long-standing ties with the U.S.A. and ally himself with the Latin American left. His plans to introduce unspecified constitutional change had provoked fears that he wished to establish a Socialist Dictatorship, following similar moves by the Venezuelan, Bolivian and Colombian leaders in recent years.

Zelaya´s Vice-President, Elvin Santos, resigned late last year in order to stand as a candidate in this November´s elections. No replacement was ever appointed. Zelaya´s successor was immediately named as the Speaker of Congress, Roberto Micheletti.

Micheletti insisted that the transition was “absolutely legal.” He cited Zelaya´s insistence on going ahead with Sunday´s referendum as a clear breach of the law and a threat to the constitution. “The army has complied with the constitution,” he said. Congress has ruled that Micheletti will hold office until January 27, 2010 – the day that the Zelaya Presidency was due to end.

For most of the afternoon of June 28, national television broadcast the swearing-in of the new President. Micheletti has promised that the elections scheduled for November will still take place. Only hours later, Micheletti declared that a curfew would be in force from 9pm to 6am on the nights of June 28 and 29.

In the course of the day, a letter surfaced in which Zelaya said he had officially resigned as the Honduran leader. Zelaya now claims that the letter was forged. The exiled President has urged his followers not to rest until he is peacefully restored. Overnight, following his instructions, a small group of protesters defied the curfew to show their support by chanting and burning tires.

Scenes turned ugly on the afternoon of June 29, as the pro-Zelaya demonstrators demanded the return of the elected leader. Police stepped in to break up the protest, using riot gear and water cannons. The demonstrators appeared badly organized, numbering a couple of hundred at the most. There were reports of two shootings which have proved impossible to verify.

It is too early to tell in which direction Micheletti will steer the country. But, internally at least, things are continuing as normal. Only a few police check-points on routes into the city give any sign of the events that have provoked such ripples internationally.

Zelaya addressed a meeting of the United Nations on June 30, which backed a resolution calling for his reinstatement. The U.N. has “firmly and categorically” urged all countries not to recognize any government in Honduras, except one headed by Zelaya. The resolution echoed statements from Washington and the European Union, which have insisted that Zelaya remains the democratically-elected head of state and urged for his return to office.

The key issue in this debate is the manner in which Zelaya was removed from power. His enforced exile, at gunpoint, and the restrictions placed upon broadcast media in the wake of his removal have left some questioning the validity of the new government.

While the events in Tegucigalpa have generally been peaceful, tension in the Honduran capital remains high. Armed soldiers still guard the Presidential Residence, and there are sporadic patrols by military helicopters. Micheletti has dismissed criticism from abroad that the ousting of Zelaya constitutes a coup. “These were democratic events,” he stated, emphasizing that Zelaya´s decision to go ahead with the planned referendum was in clear breach of the law.

From 10am on June 30, thousands of Hondurans gathered in Tegucigalpa´s Central Park to defend the new government. The protest kicked off with prayers and a passionate rendition of the Honduran national anthem. Elisa Rodriguez from the College of Law explained that the protesters were here to demonstrate their support for the new government and also to inform the international community that Honduras remains a democracy. “The international community needs to understand that we don’t want to reinstate ex-President Zelaya,” she said.

Prudencio Acosta, a reserve in the Armed Forces explained that he was attending the protest because he believed in defending the constitution and the law, something that formed part of his duty in the Armed Forces. “The ex-President thought [the people] were stupid and would tolerate whatever he wanted to do. We respect the law but our ex-President thought he could break it. The Armed Forces wouldn’t let him do so and that is why the military made the decision to exile him.” He stressed repeatedly that Honduras wanted peace. “We want peace and liberty to live and work in Honduras, to carry on with our daily lives.”

At around 1pm, the current President, Roberto Micheletti arrived and spoke to the enormous crowd. He promised in front of God and everybody before him that Honduras would hold its elections on November 29 as previously planned. The President´s speech was followed by another from General Romeo Vásquez, who was greeted with cheers of ‘thanks’ for what the military had done. He said the Armed Forces had only done its duty, which was to uphold the constitution. Both speeches were televised live on state television.

Across Latin America, government leaders are also refusing to acknowledge the legitimacy of the new government. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has threatened military action following reports that the Venezuelan Ambassador to Honduras, Armando Laguna, was attacked by “hooded military agents” and left at a roadside. Mr Laguna´s Cuban and Nicaraguan counterparts, as well as Honduran Foreign Relations Minister Patricia Rodas were also beaten, according to reports. Speaking after an emergency meeting with Mr Zelaya and other Latin American leaders (Nicaragua´s Daniel Ortega and Ecuador´s Rafael Correa) Chavez stated that should reports of violence against his ambassador be true, it would be the de factor beginning of a war. The Venezuelan military has apparently been placed on stand-by, but with the attention of the United Nations focused on the region, it seems unlikely that this is any more than an empty threat. When questioned about Hugo Chavez’s threat to send in military troops, Mr Acosta answered: “We are men, we will defend the constitution.”

º In the U.S.A., the Wall Street Journal for June 29 reported that President Obama is “deeply concerned” by events in Honduras, and has called upon Micheletti to “respect the rule of law.” Additionally, the European Union has urged a return to “normality.”

The firm line taken by Washington could prove to have far-reaching consequences. Honduras, a nation where 70 per cent of the population is poor, reportedly relies on $200 million of U.S. development aid annually. The World Bank has already put subsidies to Honduras on hold.

Zelaya is tentatively scheduled to return to Honduras on Thursday, July 2, accompanied by members of the Organization of American States. Government officials here vow to arrest Zelaya upon arrival.

Comments (25)
your fight for democracy is not being heard
25 Monday, 06 July 2009 06:44
A US Reader
In comments here earlier I made a plea for Hondurans, who are fighting for the rule of law, to take your message of freedom directly to the American people. American citizens, if they understand what has really happened would stand behind you. That, sadly, has not happened.

As expected, the biased American press has intentionally ignored and misrepresented this story and your fight is now being portrayed an just another crazy coup in Central America.

Even as America celebrated its Independence from tyranny this weekend, the US policy turned its back on the Honduran people in their fight against the Chavez and the tyranny of the OAS.

What America hears in the press is a distorted story - that Micheletti broke the law in an attempt overthrow the democratic process.

Precious time has been lost. Micheletti must address the American people directly, with haste.
God Bless you Honduras
24 Monday, 06 July 2009 03:00
Joelene
I am from the USA, and I praise your REPUBLIC for its actions in defense of its LAW. Here are some questions for those of you who believe that a coup has occured.

1. If Zelaya was allowed to proceed with his vote, what makes you think the outcome would be legitimate when Zelaya has foreign socialist military on Honduran soil on behalf of his support?

2. If Congress and or the Supreme Court do not have the authority's to direct the Military if the President breaks the law, what is their purpose? Oh yeah silly me, thats a dictatorship.

3. When Obama does the same as Zelaya will you support his right to bring the vote to the people?..If you think that this will never happen, remeber he has already said "So we need to break away from the ‘essential constraints’ the Founding Fathers placed in the constitution, and stop interpreting it as a charter of ‘negative liberties’ which set out the limits beyond which government cannot go. And we should bring about ‘redistributive change.’". ehem ie socialism

4. Learn what a Republic is!
RE: we support you from the USA
23 Sunday, 05 July 2009 23:06
kent irvin
Stay your course; don't believe the USA administration who sides with the Castro Bros, Hugo Chavez and the other Bolivar Revolution cronies who use existing democratic constitutions to seize power and then dismantle it. Look at Venezuela and make up your own mind of what your future will be like.

I used to visit Venezuela and was in Caracas during Christmas holiday in 1990 when the communist Hugo Chavez and his coup cronies tried to assassinate the democratically elected President of Venezuela and overthrow the constitution. Chavez did not give a crap about democracy then nor now. 18 years later you can see what Venezuela is going thru now.

We are now suffering under the oppression of a similar stupidity in the USA the same man who now wishes to help Hugo Chavez overthrow your constitution.

Be brave.
Coup
22 Sunday, 05 July 2009 17:46
Jake
I would like to know what the f$uck is a Venezuelan plane bringing the asshole Zelaya back to Honduras and also why is Chavez involved in this. The US is doing jackshit. This was the biggest problem Honduras made by joining ALBA. Get rid of ALBA and Chavez the ass. Go Honduras and show the world who has balls !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What about voting?
21 Sunday, 05 July 2009 17:14
Lars Erik Morin
A lot of rightwingers claim that the people of Honduras supports the politicians, generals and clergy who ousted the president. Well, if so, the rich rightwingers would win any kind of election or poll on a new constitution. So what's the problem with Zelaya's proposition? Let him go ahead and loose! Or maybe you're lying to yourself about the majority support?
This is the best article i've read so far. Explains what happened perfectly
20 Saturday, 04 July 2009 23:23
tyler
The Honduras Impeachment

Emilio Martínez, Bolivia

Would the United States have accepted foreign sympathizers of Richard Nixon
who would want to reinstall him as president?
Perhaps those who rush to qualify the recent political events in Honduras as a coup d’État should remember the case of Richard Nixon, who was removed from his office after the American Congress initiated a process brought on by the Watergate scandal.

For those who don’t know or don’t recall the episode, let me summarize it. On June 17, 1972, five men were arrested after secretly entering the Democratic National Committee offices to steal documents and bug phones.

A later investigation proved that those “plumbers,” as they became known, were part of a political espionage team linked to President Nixon, who was seeking strategic information against his opponents during an electoral campaign, That investigation opened the way to a process against the American President called impeachment, a word that means an impediment or political obstruction, even though its original meaning is to flush, to redden. This figure of speech in Anglo-Saxon law was born in the 14th century when the English Parliament accused the King of squandering public money and shamed him, causing him to redden.

A head of State challenged by impeachment must face a vote of Congress that can cause him to lose his office.

In U.S. history, three presidents have submitted to this process: Andrew Johnson (1868), the mentioned Richard Nixon (1972) and Bill Clinton (1998-1999), the latter for his scandalous affair with his young secretary Monica Lewinski. Johnson and Clinton were acquitted, but not Nixon - who chose to resign before his imminent deposal by Congress.

The present day situation in Honduras

In Honduras something similar happened. The impeachment process against ex-President José Manuel Zelaya started a week before he was deposed, soon after he triggered an institutional crisis by repeatedly violating the Constitution and challenging judicial decisions issued by the Congress of that Central-American nation.

Zelaya was already moving toward despotism in 2008 as his relation with Hugo Chaves became closer. He began to execute the methodology of a gradual coup d’État that had already been exported by the Venezuela president to several Latin American republics. This system included persecution of the free media and implementation of an illegal procedure to change the Constitution in order to keep himself in power.

The fuse that set off the crisis was Zelaya’s plan to hold a popular referendum last Sunday, June 28, that called for a vote on the dissolving of Congress and the installation of a Constituent Assembly to allow for his presidential reelection.

Even though the Supreme Electoral Court of Honduras considered the referendum unconstitutional, Zelaya ordered the Army to distribute 15,000 ballot-boxes for the referendum. This order was not obeyed by the military since it violated the sentence of the due authority.

Next, José Manuel Zelaya dismissed the military Commander, General Romeo Vasquez. In response, the Supreme Court commanded Vasquez to be reinstated in his functions and the ballot-boxes to be kept inside the military headquarters. Zelaya counter-ordered his sympathizers to invade the headquarters, take the ballot-boxes and set them up for the referendum.

A multi-party commission named by Congress to investigate the President concluded that Zelaya had violated Honduran law. That commission asked Congress to declare him unfit to govern and begin a legal process of impeachment.

It is necessary to stress that the juridical basis for such an impeachment is in the Honduran Constitution, which establishes in article 239:

“Any citizen who has already served as head of the Executive Branch cannot be President or Vice-President again. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform, as well as those who support such violation directly or indirectly, must immediately cease in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years.”

One sees, therefore, that the Honduran Congress took action to prevent a coup d’État by Zelaya against the democratic institution of the country. It voted unanimously to depose José Manuel Zelaya and named as the new head of country the president of the Congress, Roberto Micheletti, to whom this responsibility normally would fall according to the Constitution. That congressional decision was duly supported by the Supreme Court. This is how Congress carried out the legal impeachment of Zelaya.

Adding to the tense political picture was the fact that, authorized by Zelaya, Venezuelan and Nicaraguan military forces were present in Honduras posted close to the Congress. This means that when the Honduras military took action, they were also proceeding in defense of their sovereignty.

As expected, this democratic counter-coup against Zelaya caused a hysterical reaction in Hugo Chavez and his allies of ‘21st century Socialism.’ They called for an emergency meeting in their ALBA group - Bolivarian Alternative for Latin America - a new version of the Warsaw Pact. There they offered harbor to their deposed disciple and threatened to invade Honduras to reinstall him in power.

At this meeting, where Presidents Raul Castro (Cuba) and Daniel Ortega (Nicaragua) were present, statements were issued in favor of what those “moral authorities” consider to be democracy in Honduras, that is to say, only under Zelaya’s rule. Consequently, they condemned the decision of the Honduran Congress as a “coup d’État.”

Another quick reaction responding to the alarm sounded by Chavez came from the Secretary General of the American Organization of States (OAS) José Miguel Insulza, who everyone knows owes his position to the diplomatic maneuverings of Hugo Chavez.

What is lamentable is that, in addition to these expected moves of Chavez’ chess pieces, came the unexpected reaction of Barack Obama’s administration and European governments, who expressed incomprehension over the situation in Honduras. Perhaps this is due to manipulation of information or confusion about the present day situation of Latin American governments which is quite different from past epochs.

I conclude with my initial question: Would the United States have accepted the orders of foreign sympathizers of Richard Nixon who would demand that he be reinstated as president?
Constitution should be followed by both sides.
19 Saturday, 04 July 2009 08:04
David K. Kyle
If Zelaya was removed against the Constitution, then the government now in place is unconstitutional and illegitimate, there is no reasoning to get around that fact. It is apparent that Zeyla was attempting to violate the Constittuion and therefore should have been removed in the lawful process as required. Regardless if the military carried out this coup and returned power to a civilian govenrmtn they acted againt the Constitution.
Zelaya was both right and wrong about his comment on the court. The courts have destroyed our form of government here in the United States from what the Framers of the Constitution gave us. No chief executive is required to violate their oath of office in upholding the Constitution even if the court says he must. In Zelaya's case he was the one in violation and chose to ignore a correct opinion of the court. However, it goes back to then what happens. The courts should never be allowed to dictate to the military what should be done or that their orders should be carried out even if they follow the Constitution. This sets up a dangerous precedent. What happens next time when the court is wrong. The military should never be allowed to make the change, period, even if the other two branches approve of it.
Many comments I have read here speak of the Constitution being followed in Zeyla's removal, but it wasn't. You can't violate it to correct a violation otherwise you do exactly what you say you are protecting against.
Hooray!
18 Saturday, 04 July 2009 06:56
Bill Cowan
Hooray for the people of Honduras who love and respect democracy! MANY of us in America are with you as you try to preserve what the OAS and even our own President are willing to give away to despots. Be strong!!!!
Only Honduras has cajones
17 Friday, 03 July 2009 22:29
Conchita
The recent change of governments in Honduras was not a golpe de estado. The Fuerzas Armadas (FFAA) did not act on their own. They acted on behalf of constitutional civilian authorities. The FFAA then immediately turned the reins of power over to civilians. Not once did they exercise any type of authority. However, there are those who insist on labeling this act as a step retrasada. Honduras should ask those critics, what have you done for us lately? Seriously – the OAS is for democratic nations while Venezuela is still a member and Cuba was just invited to join! What a joke! In no time, this incident will be forgotten. Just as Iraq and Algeria are now on their second and third, respectively, elected governments, in the eyes of the world these governments are now legitimate. In fact, while everyone unfairly underestimates Honduras, it must be pointed out that so far, Honduras is the first nation to recognize the dangerous Bolivarian Revolution rolling across the isthmus, and consequently, decided to nip it in the bud. Bravo! In the end, this may prove to be a great act if it indeed thwarts Central American neighbors from using the democratic process to achieve dictatorial power. In any case, Honduras should now embark on damage control. They must insist over and over that this was not a coup and make clear all the legal steps that were taken in advance of Zelaya’s removal. And, Honduras should schedule an election as soon as possible. If the new government fails and Zelaya returns there could easily be bloodshed in usually peaceful Honduras. Vaya Pues! Y Vaya con Dios….
BLOGOSFERA Y CENSURA
16 Friday, 03 July 2009 14:04
galileo
Es primera vez que me censuran y eso que digo cosas argumentadas.Es un principio aceptado de los blogs y un codigo de etica que la censura no se practica.Ahora se este comentario sale se deduce que solo se publican los escritos en ingles,requisito que no existe y que està dirigido al publico de USA pero como alli se igual se lee aunque menos voy a hacer la experiencia,en una de esas el castellano aparece como un idioma mas libre.
Lo de Honduras:Para que tanto ejercicio intelectual fuè un golpe de estado clasico y yo he vivid alguno y tengo esa experiencia.
Es penoso que practicas que se consideraban extinguidas persistan aunque sea un ejemplo aislado.M
Sobre las definiciones de democracia ,puden haber distintas denominacione pero el sentido es univoco.
Està en los postulados de la revolucion francesa y en la Constitucion americana ,en todas las del mundo y probablemente en la de Honduras.
Libertad cierto pero bien entendida y no slo eso igualdad y fraternidad.
Libertad como palabra es hueca si la sociedad donde dice asentarse permite ciudadanos de primera clase.
los que pueden viajar al extranjero en vacaciones,los que pueden educar a sus hijos en colegios privados,que pueden comprar todo lo que la tecnologia hahecho para el hombre una mejor calidad de vida incluyendo un auto y las psibilidades aumentadas de acceder al poder,economico politico, o social.
Las de segunda clase,la mayoria de los hondureños,con una educacion precaria o sin ninguna,subsitiendo malamente con US uno o dos al dia.Discriminado y sin poder real que deposita cada 5 años en politicos que mantienen el statu quo.
Si los escritores del blog son ciudadanos americanos como lo son saben que es una democracia.
El manido argumento del marxismo detras de todo movimiento social.No han aprendido nada desde MacKarty
y otros fundamentalistas ultraconservadores que tanto daño hicieron a la sociedad americana.
Lo de Chavez y todos lo que han surgido es fruto del descontento popular y no de una conjura internacional,No son menos democraticosque la mayoria de los paises latinos.Al menos han sido generados en eleciones y no expulsados de laOEA menos de la ONU.
Es penoso que una practica que se consideraba especie estinguida se produzca.habrà que pasarla a la categoria de especies no deseables en peligro de extincion.
Al menos Obama compatriota creo de los autores del blog ha rechazado el golpe,no asi su embajador en Honduras.No se si la CIA detras de tanto golpe en America latina le cueste hacerlo.
En fin una inteligencia promedio podria facilmente deducir donde està el sentido de un blog pero como este pero hay mas de 200 millones de ellos en el mundo
CENSURA RIDICULA
15 Friday, 03 July 2009 13:22
galileo
ES LAMENTABLE QUE CENSUREN ALGO QUE TODO EL MUNDO SABE Y YA HA HECHO CONOCER SU OPINION.
ESO DEMUESTRA QUE LA OPINION PUBLICA TIENE RAZON
LA CENSURA ES LA FORMA MAS EXCECRABLE DE QUE NO SE CONOZCA LA VERDAD PERO ESO ES TAN IMPOSIBLE COMO ENCERRAR EN UNA CARCEL LOS PENSAMIENTOS O MATAR EL ESPIRITU HUMANO.
HICE 2 COMENTARIOS QUE CURIOSAMENTE FUERON BORRADOS
PERO TODO EL MUNDO SABE QUIENES ESTAN DETRAS DE LOS QUE APOYAN EL GROTESCO GOLPE DE ESTADO EN HONDURAS
POCO INTELIGENTE PORQUE AL FINAL SE VAN A LEER ENTRE .
SI MISMOS COMO EN EL TIEMPO DEL TERCER REICH.
AL MENOS LOS COLUMNISTAS PODIAN ESCRIBIR EN ESPAÑOL AVER SI LOS LEE ALGUIEN
Here is an article I think everyone should read b4 saying anything about the situation
14 Thursday, 02 July 2009 23:18
tyler
If you are not familiar with the country’s history and the Honduran constitution it is almost impossible that you would understand what happened here this past weekend. In 1982 my country adopted a new Constitution to allow our ordered return to democracy. After 19 previous constitution -two Spanish ones, three as part of the Republic of Central America and 14 as an independent nation- this one, at 28, has been the longest lasting one. It has lasted for so long because it responds and adapts to our changing reality, as seen in the fact that out of its original 379 articles, 7 of them have been completely or partially repealed, 18 have been interpreted and 121 have been reformed.
It also includes 7 articles that cannot be repealed or amended because they address issues that are critical for us. Those unchangeable articles deal with the form of government, the extent of our borders, the number of years of the presidential term; two prohibitions -one to reelect presidents and another one to change the article that states who can’t run for president- and one article that penalizes the abrogation of the Constitution.
In these 28 years Honduras has found legal ways to deal with its own problems. Each and every successful country around the world lived similar trial and error processes until they were able to find legal vehicles that adapt to their reality. France had 13 Constitutions between 1789 and the adoption of the current one in 1958 which has passed 22 constitutional revisions. The USA had one before this one which has been amended 27 times since 1789 and the British –pragmatic as they are- in 900 years have change it so many times that they have never taken the time to compile their Constitution into a single body of law.
Having explained that, under our Constitution, what happened in Honduras this last Sunday? Soldiers arrested and took out of the country a Honduran citizen that, the day before, through his actions had stripped himself of the presidency of Honduras.
These are the hard facts. Last Friday Mister Zelaya, with his cabinet, issued a decree ordering all government employees to take part in the “Public Opinion Poll to convene a National Constitutional Assembly” (Presidential Decree PCM-020). The decree was published on Saturday on the official newspaper. With this event, Mister Zelaya triggered a constitutional protection that automatically removed him from office.
The key legal elements for that constitutional protection to be triggered are the following ones. Constitutional assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. In Honduras, you have 365 articles that can be changed by Congress. When Zelaya published that decree to regulate an “opinion poll” about the possibility of convening a national assembly he acted against the unchangeable articles of the constitution that deal with the prohibition of reelecting a president and of extending his term. His actions showed intent.
How is that kind of intent sanctioned in our Constitution? With the immediate removal of those involved in the action as stated in article 239 of the Constitution which reads: “No citizen that has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform, as well as those that support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years.” Notice that the rule speaks about intent and that it also says immediately –as in instant, as in no trial required, as in no impeachment needed.
This immediate sanction might sound draconian, but every country knows its own enemies and it is the black letter of our supreme law. Requiring no previous trial might be crazy, but in Latin America a President is no ordinary citizen, it is the most powerful figure of the land and historically the figure has been above the law. To prevent that officer from using its power to stay in office Honduras has constitutional rules such as the mentioned one.
I am extremely proud of my compatriots. Finally, we have decided to stand up and become a country of laws, not men. From now on, here, no one will be above the law.
proud of you honduras
13 Thursday, 02 July 2009 22:19
craig spencer
This gringo married to a honduran is proud of you for standing up against the communist Zelaya and the rest of the world. Its unfornuate this includes the new socialistic leftist radicals in our Administration. To the skepics: should the Hondurans have waited until Zelaya was a communist dictator with absolute power over society? By the way to the fellow calling us all fools, its coup, not "cue". Cue is for cuestick--dipstick.
HONDURAS OPEN YOUR EYES
12 Thursday, 02 July 2009 00:47
walter elisondor
Jose Manuel Zelaya was trying to violate our constitution and because of that he was condemned but let's see the other side of the coin, Roberto Micheletti has violated our constitution,too and what have happened to him?. Answer: he is the president of Honduras rigth now. Remember; according to our constitution no one can change or modify ´´Los articulos petreos´´ but Micheletti and many another congressmen modified them and because of that here in Honduras we do not have the person (Designado presidencial) that according to law has to replace Manuel Zelaya. Where were all the people and organizations that is accusing Manuel Zelaya rigth Now?. HONDURAS OPEN YOUR EYES. The congress, the Supreme Court and a few other organization felt affraid of what Manuel Zelaya was doing because it would reduce their power and that is the reason why the condemned him, otherwise they were supporting him. Manuel Zelaya is guilty, Yes. but Micheletti is guilty, too. All the people that is in favor of Micheletti is violating the constitution,too. At the end of this chapter in our history the winner are going to be the ones that have been ruling our country for decades and for the rest of the country that God help us. sorry if i misspell any word but i am just learning english.
Freedom
11 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 20:43
James Butler Bonham
The freedom loving people of TEXAS salute you and your efforts to apply your consitution to the tyrant and corrupt ex president Zelaya. We stand with you against your oprresor and the tyrants who would try to dismantle your efforts to return to a government by and for the people. Texas is also held back by its oppressor , the central socialist government of Obama and his evil plan to bring us all under his power and control. We will resist with every ounce of courage we can muster and will need the support from freedom loving people around the world. After you have succeeded in showing the world that they can no longer resist the spirit of liberty, remember us as we go forward to once again become the great Republic and people we once were and can still be. We support you and wish yuou well and tell you from our hearts that our feelings are the feelings of the majority of citizens in the United States. Our constitution has been abused as well and being disrespected by those in power. We will not be silent forever. We join you in solidarity for a representative republican form of constitutional government. God Bless the people of Honduras, and God Bless Texas! OAS and Mexico..you are about to be on the wrong side of history....You do so at your own peril.
Honduran fight for their Constitution
10 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 20:33
Evelyn Begin
Most American applaud what the Supreme Court and the Congress of Hondura did in expelling Zelaya. Do not take what Obama says as the opinion of the American people. Anyone with any brains in this country is starting to understand what he (Obama) is trying to do, and many of us are standing up against him. We like our freedoms and we respect your wish to have these same freedoms. If it comes to it, the people of the US will rise up as you did although we hope it won't be necessary. God's good graces be on all of you.
Watch Obama.
9 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 18:38
Eugene Z.
Not only is he leading the US into socialism he is the most radically left president we have had. He is very arrogant and out for himself, or whomever is pulling his strings.

We Americans would be wise to take careful note how this event plays out in Honduras.

I for one say stay your ground Honduran friends. You will go down on the correct side of history.

Vive Honduras.
I am so proud of Honduran's
8 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 18:05
greg
Don't listen to the misiah Obama. He will stab you
in the back. Honduran's did what is right. They
stood up for their constitution.

In the coming years they will be proud of their stand.

Do not back down.
Assault in self-defense.
7 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 09:14
Malcolm Alexander
RE: "READ the articles of the Honduran Constitution. It will tell exactly what needs to be done to remove a president who tries to change the constitution. 1) 15 Honduran legislators MUST indict Zelaya of the alleged charges and 2) 25 Honduran legislators must vote to dispprove of Zelaya's actions. Once those 35 Honduran legislators do their part THEN the congress can proceed to remove him from office through impeachment proceedings. THAT IS THE LAW, THAT IS THE CONSTITUTIONAL process that Micheletti IGNORED."

With all due respect to "gatitanegra", the slow, deliberate process outlined here is a constitutional process meant to be followed in a constitutionally sound and stable environment. Zelaya had clearly made himself a danger to peace and stability in the country, first, by attempting to foment unrest against the constitutional government among those involved in various unrelated social issues and then attempting to hijack the military by firing its legally bound leader.

There is irony in a comment made by "A US Reader" that "Micheletti may have averted a dictatorship but did not properly follow the constitutional process." It cannot be denied that, in this case, pursuing a slow, deliberate procedure in first gear while a renegade's revolutionary incitements took off in overdrive might have been the real threat to democracy in Honduras.

In law, there is a justification for assault, and that is self-defense. Can Zelaya really claim protection by the very constitution he was assailing? Of course he can, and he has. But this is the ploy of a disingenuous man in the mold of Hugo Chavez.

I am a US citizen living in Honduras. I am appalled by the reaction of so much of the world on Zelaya's behalf. The former president is a charismatic, intelligent and sneaky man. He has fooled those outside of Honduras as he did so many inside. I am ashamed of the president of the US and his partner in idiocy, Hillary Clinton. HONDURAS, please do not think that either speaks for all Americans. There are those with wisdom among us.
Breaking the laws - which ones?
6 Wednesday, 01 July 2009 07:50
John Tucker
Gatita negra makes some interesting points. But it is in the very context of fear of dictatorship that Honduras' Supreme Court, Congress, and military acted. Micheletti said immediately that he did not intend to run for President and that the election would take place as scheduled. Zelaya only 3 days after his attempt at an illegal referendum and his deposing said he wouldn't run again. Who is believable? I would go with Micheletti for the very reason Zelaya was deposed. I am very confident that Hondurans are adamant about keeping their democracy intact. They will depose Micheletti if he doesn't follow through - as they should. Occasionally and understandably laws must be stretched or even broken in defense against someone who was attempting to unilaterally break the one law that is at the heart of democracy in Honduras - ONE TERM ONLY!
Please register or login to add your comments to this article.

News Categories

Sponsored Links

Gold Sponsor

Minister Suites: Suite Dreams in Tegucigalpa

Advertisement