Honduras: Injustice Under Law
Last Updated on Friday, 19 February 2010 15:56
By W. E. Gutman
On June 28, 2009, as half the world awoke to a new round of fiscal woes, civil unrest and war, in another part of the globe, under the cover of darkness, a constitutionally elected leader was rudely stirred from bed and, still in his pajamas, abducted at gunpoint and flown out of the country. The leader: President Manuel Zelaya, of Honduras. The abductors: Masked soldiers acting under orders of General Romeo Vásquez Velásquez. The usurper of power: Right-wing Honduran Congress President Roberto Micheletti. Everybody called it a coup, including the United States which, spurred by hasty but disingenuous scruples, later turned its back on Mr. Zelaya. Despite strong international pressure to return Mr. Zelaya to office for the remainder of his term (which should have ended on January 27), Micheletti refused.
On November 29, after months of political turmoil and less than transparent elections, Porfirio Lobo Sosa, the chameleon-like farmer-politician who attended Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow and has since bared his fondness of ultra-right-wing causes, was elected Mr. Zelaya’s successor. Predictably, the US, Colombia, Mexico, Panama and Peru certified the results. Nine Latin American nations and several European states rejected the legitimacy of Mr. Lobo’s election on the grounds that he had been propped by an illegitimate caretaker government that wrested power from Mr. Zelaya with military help. Mr. Lobo was installed as president of Honduras on January 27.
Myths and misinformation surrounding the crisis have since surfaced.
* Myth: This was not a coup; Mr. Zelaya was impeached by the Supreme Court. Fact: Mr. Zelaya was overthrown by the military. Soldiers stormed into his bedroom, kidnapped him and dumped him on the tarmac in San José, Costa Rica.
* Myth: Mr. Zelaya was removed for illegally seeking to extend his term of office. Fact: Mr. Zelaya proposed a non-binding national referendum to gauge support for a redraft of the constitution. Inelligible to run for a second term, Mr. Zelaya was not on the November ballot.
Gen. Romeo Vásquez, who refused to carry out Mr. Zelaya’s orders to help oversee the plebiscite, was fired. The Supreme Court ruled that Gen. Vásquez’s dismissal was illegal and most members of Congress ganged up on Mr. Zelaya.
* Myth: The plebiscite was a ruse to get Mr. Zelaya another term in office. Fact: Even if voters supported constitutional changes, Mr. Zelaya was a lame-duck office-holder.
* Myth: Mr. Zelaya was out of touch with the Honduran people who were “happy” with the status quo. Fact: Mr. Zelaya’s call for constitutional amendments acknowledged that current statutes heavily favor the rich, especially landowners (such as Porfirio Lobo) while disfavoring the poor, especially the indigenous minorities and small farmers who make up the bulk of the population.
* Myth: The regime that overthrew Mr. Zelaya had popular support. Fact: Coup supporters are overwhelmingly wealthy businessmen, ranchers and an urban middle class that have benefited from an economic system that favors the few rather than the many. Largely owned and controlled by the elite the Honduran media have systematically skewed reality with lies.
Adding insult to injury the coup regime has repeatedly suspended civil liberties and used violence to crack down of legitimate protests and demonstrations. Death squads trained by the infamous US Army School of the Americas (as was Gen. Vásquez) were responsible for multiple deaths and disappearances. Trade union leaders, heads of non-governmental organizations, indigenous leaders and opposition politicians were severely beaten. TV and radio stations were taken off the air. Journalists were assaulted.
Such brutal measures by a third-rate banana republic could not have been taken without the acquiescence of some mighty patron, presumably the US. In spite of his “electoral” victory, Mr. Lobo -- whose security detail includes Mossad agents -- lacks popular support and Zelaya backers have demanded that coup leaders be brought to justice. Arrest warrants have since been issued for Honduras’ top six military commanders, including Gen. Vásquez, for abuse of power.
In a supposed democracy, the military serve at the pleasure of the civilian government. They have no role in the executive branch other than take orders. They cannot decide who should be in power.
Most Hondurand are disheartened. They know that Mr. Lobo, the “Wolfman” who once ran on the promise to reinstate the death penalty, will head a dictatorial, right-wing regime. The tin-pot soldiers who engineered and carried out Zelaya’s explusion will be absolved of all charges because they will be judged by their own kind –- Congress and the Supreme Court -- the same institutions that conspired against the legitimately elected Zelaya.
They should instead be charged with treason, murder and gross human rights violations.
As the world watches the unfolding Punch and Judy show, the International Court in The Hague has not dropped the charges.
Accustomed to injustice under law, Hondurans are not holding their breath. (photo of W. E. Gutman courtesy Internet)
Note: W. E. Gutman is a veteran journalist. From 1991 to 2006 he covered politics, the military and human rights in Central America. He was a frequent contributor to Honduras This Week. His column reflects his own views and not necessarily those of Honduras Weekly.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
News Categories
Latest Press Releases
-
Conference on Honduras 2010 Set for Copán Ruinas in October
...
Readmore... -
US Embassy in Tegucigalpa Issues Dengue Warning for Honduras
...
Readmore... -
World Bank President Zoellick to Visit Central America and Mexico
...
Readmore... -
PFC Seeks Volunteers to Document Health of Children in Copán Mountains
...
Readmore... -
Millicom International Cellular Takes Full Control of Celtel
...
Readmore...











It is obvious that you have enjoyed, and made use of, an excellant education.
I apologize,sir, but after your comments here and your supposed knowledge and experience in Honduras (I do see that you are based out of Los
Angeles, pardon my spelling if I am wrong) you have sorely wasted said education.
How can you possibly justify your statements regarding "myths" and your explanations thereof?
The true value of an education is how a person chooses to make use of it. Sadly, you have proven how a good education, and a use of language, can be sorely wasted.
Please, sir, attempt to educate yourself about what really happened in Honduras - possibly be actually living here?
I thank Honduras Weekly for printing what you had to say, at least they are fulfilling their mandate of providing a venue for the expression of all opinions.
Stephanie, La Ceiba & northern Canada
Having said that, and as a confirmed anti-militarist, I deplore any and all military actions not fully debated then endorsed by the people, not just by their corruptible "elected" representatives.
To write of non-existent death squads invalidates your claim to be a serious journalist, as does your failure to note that Zelaya's order to the military was illegal and would have resulted in the violation of a supreme court order. I would think that a victim of the holocaust would be the last one to support the military blindly following orders regardless of legality or morality.
1. I am an observer, not a policy-maker. I no more supported Zelaya (or Lobo) than I did the preceding three colossally inept or brazenly corrupt administrations that I studied and wrote about – Reina, Flores and Maduro. My article, which echoes the analyses and endorses the views of the world media, takes Honduras to task for its truculence, its lack of gallantry and its crass disregard for the letter of constitunal law. I do not mourn Mr. Zelaya’s fall from grace; I deplore the unceremonious manner in which he was removed. I would have advocated a national referendum but the Supreme Court and the colonels would have vetoed any attempt to let the people speak.
2. I am not contemptuous of Honduras, only of its dismal record of political chicanery and ineptness. Nor am I “against” Honduran immigrants. On the contrary, I have advocated on behalf of “illegal immigrants” and, in one case acted as an expert witness on behalf of a Honduran seeking political asylum in the U.S. I am happy to report that my testimony and verifiable exhibits helped win the case.
3. I am a Holocaust survivor and a victim of communism. To paint me as some flaming Stalinist – a device used by the extreme right to smear its opponents – is as disingenuous as it is dull-witted. I will not stand for it.
4. The rest of your raucous litany only serves to underline the frenetic efforts by the plutocrats to justify their dogmas and abysmal behavior. There may be no free press in Honduras, as many of my Honduran fellow journalists concede in private, but it is thankfully free and honest in other parts of the world, and the world has spoken loudly and clearly on the revolting events that unfolded in the recent past.
5. I stand by my column which, in the interest of decorum, was far more sedate than it should have been.
Why don’t you come out from behind your alias and show your face, as I did?
W. E. Gutman
Truth in Honduras
http://trutherator.wordpress.com/2010/02/01/truth-in-honduras/#comment-34
But he pretends to refute some points made by the valiant defenders of constitutional representative democracy in Honduras, of which the most brilliant example is Roberto Micheletti, therefore strongly suggesting that he knows he's not telling the truth.
--trutherator